All of these people would be radically incompetent, attempting to operate the political world based on a progressive State lie propagated in a shifting area!

 That's why we just have to think: it's more urgent than ever, and it's not reduced to the exercise of knowledge or power. On the contrary, it requires additional surveillance directed towards these decision-making areas of thought (for example, the question for the man, for the being of the man and for the life and for his prothesis, for the tele-work, the question for the production and the question for the being, where he commands the ever-new question of the «¿what to do?», the question of the «ven», the question for the justice surrounding it that in Espectros de Marx intends to show how the question for the presence or non-presence of the present results inseparably, etc.). These areas of decision, whose telegraphic statement will forgive me, have to impose itself at every moment, daily, immediately, at each step, at each sentence, in a new way, not only at each bell particularly for those who have professions and are deciding to those who intend to exercise the positions of responsible decision-makers, professors or ministers (political men of all class, whether legislators or not, men and women of science, teachers, media professionals, advisors and ideologists in all domains, in particular of politics, ethics or law).All these people would be radically incompetent, paradoxically, in advance, as they always believe, who are men, etc., who are life, who want to decide «present», etc., who want to decide «just», who want to decide «come», and who want to decide who comes, he other, the hospitality, the don; They would be incompetent, as I believe they often are, because they believe they know, because they are in a position to know and are incapable of articulating these questions and learning to form them. They don't know where and how they were formed, or how to learn how to get them back to form.